![]() |
| An e-biker reports what California is considering doing about them. |
Bear with me for a moment. I want to applaud California for regulating so-called electric "bicycles," the fast ones that we call "bicycles," even if they don't have pedals!
I'm reacting to an informative video by an e-bike rider that explains what is under consideration.
But, first, a little background.
I've just returned from a family reunion, held in California, my first visit to the Golden State in years. California has changed a lot in the decades since I lived there, but there was one thing I was sure to keep in mind, something I remembered from my days there as a young driver:
California actually enforces pedestrians' right of way in crosswalks.
Driving our rental car, I paused when pedestrians stepped off the curb and, when I was a pedestrian myself, I had the unusual experience of cars stopping to let me get safely across the street. It was nice. It seemed civilized.
This is not generally the case in any other U.S. state I've visited. Drivers routinely —maybe even intentionally — intimidate people in crosswalks into letting the cars barrel through first, regardless of the "Walk" signal.
If the traffic light changes to "Don't Walk" before the pedestrians make it across, well, that's just too bad.
This is the law of the urban jungle. Pedestrians have a lot more to lose in case of collision with a car, so they must beware.
Unfortunately, now, with the advent of electric (so-called) bicycles, the same intimidating danger of collision extends to sidewalks and pathways almost everywhere. Not all riders of electrics use the walkways, of course, but enough do, in cities, to create a whole new dynamic.
Parents pushing strollers, children walking to school, seniors moving slowly and people walking dogs on leashes are forced, by the fast-moving (and silent!) danger, to give way to what are in fact, whether legally defined as such or not, motor vehicles on the sidewalks.
Ironically, these riders use the sidewalk ramps at intersections that were originally intended to ease the way for the handicapped — not for motorized traffic. Well, that certainly didn't work out as planned!
Finding a way under law to enhance safety is complicated, and California may or may not get it right.
The e-bike riders fear and oppose having to register, pay taxes, display license plates, wear safety gear, carry required lighting, and endure speed limits far below their speed capabilities. These are all things most motorcyclists accept without complaint.
Most basic to motorcycling law are age limits on when a young adult can ride.
Increasingly, these fast-moving electric machines, purchased by adults, are being ridden by their children. Age limits? My home state doesn't seem to have them.
Obviously, no one expects to ride a motorcycle on a sidewalk. Yet, understandably, e-bike riders want to ride on sidewalks and pathways. It's safer for them than riding in the street and, besides, the practice is that, on the sidewalk, you can ride "against traffic."
It seems pretty clear that the future is electric. There will be more electric motorcycles that will obey all the standards set for motorcycles. Good.
Increasingly, there also will be forms of electric mobility that may require lesser standards.
Although, if you think about it: why?
If you're going that fast, don't you need to be on the street, obeying the laws that apply on the street?



